WebOCTOBER TERM, 2009. CITIZENS UNITED V. FEDERAL ELECTION COMM'N. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. CITIZENS UNITED v. FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION. appeal from the united states district court for the district of columbia. No. 08–205. Argued March 24, 2009—Reargued September 9, … WebMar 2, 2010 · The statement must identify the person making the expenditure, the amount, the election to which the communication was directed, and the names of certain contributors (§ 434(f)(2)). Again, the district court ruled against Citizens United and granted summary judgment to the FEC. Citizens United appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. ISSUES ON …
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act - Wikipedia
WebJan 14, 2016 · January 21 will mark the sixth anniversary of the Supreme Court decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, one of the worst and most damaging … WebJun 15, 2010 · Perhaps relying on this mischaracterization and the public’s lack of knowledge about the applicability of Citizens United to unions, liberals in Congress have proposed legislation in the form of ... cst to panvel
The ‘Citizens United’ decision and why it matters
WebOct 18, 2012 · An attempt by Congress to pass a law requiring disclosure was blocked by Republican lawmakers. The Citizens United decision was surprising given the sensitivity regarding corporate and union money being used to influence a federal election. Congress first banned corporations from funding federal campaigns in 1907 with the Tillman Act. WebJustice Kennedy delivered the opinion of the Court. Federal law prohibits corporations and unions from using their general treasury funds to make independent expenditures for speech defined as an “electioneering communication” or for speech expressly advocating the election or defeat of a candidate. 2 U. S. C. §441b. Web3 arguments for Citizens United. 1. The First Amendment applies equally to speech by individuals and speech by groups. 2. If a movie about a political candidate produced by a corporation can be banned, then books about political candidates that are published within 60 days of an election might be banned as well. 3. early pictures of skin cancer